Ten years in the past, I received my first non-academic job as a market researcher and author. The commute was solely about half-hour in every path, however parking was costly and public transportation wasn’t an choice. I not often had conferences; I communicated with my supervisor and my colleagues—all seated in the identical open-plan workplace area—nearly completely through e mail and chat.
After a number of months of noise-canceling headphones, I requested my supervisor if I may do business from home generally. From a 2023 perspective, he reacted as if I’d made a ridiculous request, like decreasing my working hours to fifteen minutes each different day or maintaining a child tiger below my desk. He ultimately agreed to a trial interval, however the resolution that appeared apparent to me was a tough promote for him.
A decade of technological progress and one pandemic later, there’s a lot much less reflexive resistance to the concept of working remotely. However during the last yr or so, particularly after the official finish of the COVID-19 Public Well being Emergency in america, a few of that hostility towards working from residence (we’re lazy ! we put on pajamas !) has returned. Headlines, blogs, inner message boards, and LinkedIn feeds are dense with dialogue about whether or not we should always all return to the workplace, proceed working remotely, or navigate some type of center floor.
We spent the previous few months consuming the information, diving into the analysis, and chatting with colleagues to convey you some perspective on the return-to-office (RTO) dialog and to get a deal with on the connection between developer happiness, productiveness, and distant work. We’ll additionally contact on the downstream results of RTO mandates on variety, recruitment and retention, worker satisfaction, and total efficiency.
Employees don’t wish to be compelled again to the workplace
Flexibility is a excessive precedence for builders and different data staff. It shouldn’t be a shock, then, that RTO mandates should not fashionable with staff, a few of whom are merely quitting in response.
Our personal annual survey {of professional} builders discovered, for the third yr in a row, that flexibility is an important purpose why builders keep in a job (or search for a brand new one). One other current survey discovered that one in three builders would stop in the event that they had been now not allowed to do business from home.
And it’s not simply builders. Practically half of staff in a single survey mentioned they might stop if their employer ordered them again to the workplace full-time, and most staff would ditch an office-only job for a distant job even when it meant a pay reduce, in keeping with one other survey of greater than 8,400 US staff. That survey discovered that 17% of staff mentioned they might quit 20% of their paycheck to work remotely, whereas 10% would give up greater than 20%. That is true regardless of the price of dwelling disaster.
Most CEOs need staff to return to the workplace
CEOs, statistically talking, should not on the identical web page as their staff. A KPMG examine of greater than 1,300 world CEOs discovered that 64% consider that everyone might be again to working from the workplace by 2026. Plus, 87% of CEOs mentioned they had been extra prone to lavish “favorable assignments, raises, or promotions” on staff who got here into the workplace than on those that labored remotely.
There’s a big disconnect between what organizations and CEOs see as the advantages of working onsite and the advantages staff really report receiving. Unsurprisingly, there’s an extra disconnect between how women and men entry these advantages. McKinsey and Firm’s 2023 Ladies within the Office report discovered that “whereas 77 % of firms consider a powerful organizational tradition is a key advantage of on-site work, most staff disagree: solely 39 % of males and 34 % of ladies who work on-site say a key profit is feeling extra linked to their group’s tradition. On high of this, males usually tend to profit from working on-site.”
The analysis isn’t so simple as you would possibly assume
Among the many first questions that comes up in any dialog about distant work is whether or not individuals are kind of productive working from residence. One drawback with this query is that “productiveness” is clearly not an easy metric . Does it imply traces of code? Imply change lead time? The variety of hours you log on the workplace?
Nor do all productiveness research use the identical methodology. Some contain “worker time use captured by monitoring purposes on work gadgets” , whereas others merely requested individuals how productive they thought they had been when working remotely.
And naturally, the selection will not be essentially (and even often) between “work full-time from the workplace” and “work full-time from residence.” Many individuals have hybrid schedules , the place they work from the workplace on some days and remotely on others.
Given these ambiguities of which means and methodology, it’s not a shock that many research on distant and/or hybrid work have complicated or apparently contradictory findings. For instance, a Stanford examine discovered that totally distant work was related to a ten% drop in productiveness, however that hybrid working “seems to don’t have any influence on productiveness.” The authors notice, nonetheless, that their examine doesn’t consider the cash firms save with a remote-first strategy, from lack of actual property prices to world hiring. The examine authors additionally notice that hybrid schedules enhance recruitment and retention—as a result of, once more, flexibility is essential to individuals .
A current working paper from the Nationwide Bureau of Financial Analysis means that distant staff are much less productive, however as one knowledgeable who unpacked its shortcomings exhibits , additionally fails to deal with elements like the price of actual property, the influence of RTO mandates on retention and recruitment, and a spread of accessibility and variety issues.
Lastly, loads of these urging RTO , together with the pinnacle of the world’s largest industrial landlord , have a vested curiosity in individuals returning to industrial actual property properties and patronizing the companies on which these properties rely. They’ve a monetary stake in preserving white-collar enterprise districts even when the info doesn’t help the competition that each day in-person interplay is important to supply progressive, inventive, and significant work.
What’s lacking from the dialog?
It’s price asking why, in most conversations about distant work, we ask about productiveness first, as an alternative of main with accessibility, variety, or happiness. Productiveness will not be essentially an easy or revealing metric, and a seemingly squishy idea like happiness can have a quantifiable influence on an organization’s efficiency. Nor are variety and accessibility issues mere background noise within the RTO dialog; they’re essential factors to think about.
Individuals are happier working from residence
A current examine reported in Forbes discovered that “staff who labored from residence 100% of the time had been 20% happier on common than those that didn’t have the power to do business from home.” That examine additionally discovered “a powerful correlation between work happiness and total happiness.” One other examine discovered that “individuals who have the chance to work remotely a minimum of month-to-month are 24% extra prone to really feel comfortable and productive of their roles.”
Happiness at work isn’t a nice-to-have with no relationship to organizational efficiency. Quite the opposite, enterprise psychologist Dr. Camille Preston argues that selling worker happiness advantages everybody , with comfortable staff working extra productively and producing extra gross sales . She’s hardly alone. “Happiness raises practically each enterprise and academic consequence: elevating gross sales by 37%, productiveness by 31%, and accuracy on duties by 19%,” writes Sean Achor, writer of the ebook The Happiness Benefit.
RTO mandates are unhealthy for variety
At Stack Overflow, we take it as a on condition that variety, fairness, and inclusion are essential. Earlier this yr, we wrote that the rounds of tech layoffs in 2022 and 2023 had been a big blow to variety in tech, disproportionately affecting girls and folks of shade. The identical systemic inequities are in play in relation to how RTO mandates have an effect on variety in tech—for example, the above-mentioned McKinsey and Firm report discovered that ladies reap fewer advantages from working on-site than males do.
Prithwiraj Choudhury, a Harvard Enterprise Faculty professor, advised The Washington Publish that by imposing inflexible RTO mandates, “you’re risking your high performers and variety. It simply doesn’t make financial sense.” Choudhury additionally emphasised that ladies are resigning at greater charges in response to RTO mandates than males are. This truth will not be solely confirmed by the analysis however frankly intuitive, contemplating the gender wage hole in america and the fact that ladies shoulder extra family work , significantly childcare, than their male companions even when each work full-time.
Individuals with disabilities and advocacy teams have additionally warned that RTO mandates disproportionately harm staff with disabilities, together with neurodivergent individuals. The choice to work remotely makes work extra accessible to a wider vary of individuals, and when employers take away the choice with out regard for the way it impacts people, they’re rendering their workplaces much less accessible and fewer numerous. (To not point out, much less engaging to potential staff.)
Our view
Stack Overflow has embraced a remote-first philosophy from the start. We wrote about why enabling distant work was essential to us and the way we made it occur approach again in 2017 . In March 2020 , with so many individuals adjusting to distant work for the primary time, we shared our distant staff’ greatest recommendation for working from residence. It’s baked into our tradition, and the well-honed async communication , respect for work-life stability, and emphasis on outcomes over hours-spent-at-desk attracted lots of our staff, together with yours actually.
At organizations the place not all staff work remotely, management tends to “systematically [undervalue] the productiveness of hybrid and distant staff,” in keeping with analysis by Nick Bloom , a preeminent scholar of distant and hybrid work. Bloom’s findings counsel that many in-office managers haven’t been correctly educated to handle distant staff. Based on an article in Fortune discussing Bloom’s analysis, “supervisor coaching is the largest impediment to efficient hybrid work efficiency for organizations–and a serious driver of the continuous ratcheting up of days within the workplace.”
Maybe the issue is much less about staff sporting pajama pants and extra about managers struggling to use an outdated framework to how individuals really wish to reside and work in 2023.
As an alternative of unilaterally ordering staff again to the workplace, organizations would possibly take this chance to determine the best way to make distant work work for them. If our expertise is something to go by, an openness to distant or hybrid work is the way you appeal to the perfect expertise and earn a status as a stellar place to work.
![The 2025 Resume Writing Information [+ Job Search Tips and Resume Examples]](https://www.tocqi.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/eb045f9d14638eeda692f665562e1e1c.jpg)
